Using Zola (and other static site generators) with GitHub Pages without the need for an access token

September 19, 2020

Moving from Jekyll to Zola

There are many static site generators: Jekyll, Hakyll, Hugo, Hexo, Lector, Sphinx, MkDocs, GitBook, Pelican, 11ty, Zola, and many others.

I have used Jekyll for many years in many projects and one of the reasons why it is so popular is that it is supported by GitHub Pages out of the box, without doing any extra steps. This makes it comparably simple to deploy blogs, homepages, and project websites without running own web servers.

But recently I started exploring alternatives to Jekyll because it felt like not a perfect fit for what I wanted to do. I often felt I am pressing something else than a blog into a framework designed for blogs. I was looking for a framework where I can more easily customize things, where I achieve a better separation between content and form, and where I know the underlying language better.

In the recent weeks have tested many of the above tools and really liked Hugo but my favorite static site generator at the moment is Zola, and I have migrated already few projects to Zola. Zola really stood out, offers super fast build and rebuild, easy installation, a link checker, clever image processing, shortcodes (reusable macros), and much more. Overall the folder layout and the scaffold structure maps better to how I think about a website.

What I wanted to find out is: how can I use Zola on GitHub Pages with the same ease as Jekyll: commit and push files and that's it.

Deploying to GitHub Pages using GitHub Actions and using a personal access token

I was following this recipe until now.

The approach described there requires creating a personal access token and storing it as a secret. This is not difficult and it only takes 2 minutes to set up but I was never fully happy with this solution because of the bus/lottery factor (how many persons have to be run over by a bus or win the lottery for a project to become unmaintained). I wanted to create open source websites which anybody can contribute to and which do not depend on me creating and maintaining access tokens now or in future.

How to build the page without creating a personal access token

It is indeed possible! And the approach described here should work for many of the mentioned static site generators (I am using this not only for Zola but also for pages built with Sphinx).

All you need to do is to add (and adapt, more about this later) the file .github/workflows/build.yml to your GitHub repository with the following content (I am grateful to Richard Darst for many improvements of the original workflow towards its current form):

name: Build/deploy website

  ZOLA_VERSION: "0.15.3"
  TARGET_BRANCH: "gh-pages"

      - main
      - main

    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    - name: Check out repo
      uses: actions/checkout@v2
    - name: Install zola
      run: |
        set -x
        wget -O - \
           "${ZOLA_VERSION}/zola-v${ZOLA_VERSION}-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz" \
        | sudo tar xzf - -C /usr/local/bin
    - name: Generate HTML
      run: zola build
    - name: Deploy to gh-pages
      if: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref == format('refs/heads/{0}', env.SOURCE_BRANCH) }}
      uses: peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@v3
        github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
        publish_dir: ./public
        force_orphan: true

You will need to adapt SOURCE_BRANCH (this is where the Zola sources are; in this example: main) and TARGET_BRANCH (this is the branch which contains the generated HTML and is used by GitHub Pages; in this example: gh-pages).

This workflow creates a new target branch every time the source branch is modified.

  • For project pages of the form the source branch is typically main and the target branch is typically gh-pages.
  • The target branch is master for homepages or project pages of the form and Make sure that SOURCE_BRANCH and TARGET_BRANCH have different names. In this case I like to call SOURCE_BRANCH as source.

But the nice thing is that the above workflow is easily adaptable to either situation.

Once you adapt, commit, and push this file, all that remains is to enable GitHub Pages under the repository settings page. That's it!


Zola is a really nice tool with great documentation - try it out! Indeed, this website is built using Zola and here is the workflow that I am using to build this site. With the above recipe setting up a Zola build is no more difficult than setting up a Jekyll build.


  • In a previous version of this post I was using macos-10.15 for the build and not ubuntu-latest. I have later switched to ubuntu-latest for faster/sooner workflow runs.